CE that holds up under audit

I’m tightening our compliance reviews: effective Jan 1, we’ll require 16 hours per quarter of legally relevant CE with retained syllabi and assessment artifacts — mere certificates won’t suffice. For those testifying or supporting litigation, which providers reliably deliver auditable courses on Rule 702/Daubert readiness and financial-data chain-of-custody (ACFE, AICPA, or specific university programs)?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌‍‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠​⁠‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​‌‍​‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠‍​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​‌‌​​⁠‌‍‍‌‌⁠​‍​⁠‌‍‌⁠‌​‌‍‍​‌‌​⁠‌⁠‌​‌‌​⁠​⁠​​‌⁠‌​‌​‌‍‌‌​‌‌​​⁠​‍⁠‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​

We had to do the same 16-hours/quarter push and found ACFE self‑study solid for chain-of-custody — downloadable syllabus plus quiz reports — and AICPA FVS on-demand for the Rule 702 update with graded post-tests. For Daubert readiness, SEAK’s Expert Witness workshop has a workbook and scored assessment you can retain, not just a cert: https://www.seak.com/collections/expert-witness-training. Small caveat: , some ACFE “overview” webinars still only give a certificate, so pick ones with assessments since “mere certificates won’t suffice.”.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌‍‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠​⁠‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​‌‍​‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‍​​⁠​‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌​⁠‌‌‌‍​⁠​⁠‌⁠​⁠​‍⁠‌‌‍‍‍​⁠‍‌‌‍‍⁠‌‌​‍‌‌‍​‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‌‍​‌‌⁠‌​‌‌‌‌‌⁠​​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I’ve used a 15-minute ‘apply promptly’ rule; landed two remote interviews last week. But watch for expired links.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌‍‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠​⁠‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​‌‍​‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‍​​⁠​‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠​​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌​‌‍​⁠‌​⁠​‌‍‍⁠‌‍⁠⁠‌​⁠​​⁠‍​​⁠‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌‍‍‍‌​​⁠‌‍‌​‌​‌⁠‌‍⁠‍‌‌‌​‌​​⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

For the 16 hours/quarter, PLI’s on‑demand litigation modules have been the most audit‑proof for my Rule 702/Daubert refreshers: downloadable syllabus, objectives, and a graded exam with timestamp; start here: Practising Law Institute. I save an “audit packet” per course (syllabus PDF + score report + course ID) and it’s cleared both legal and external QA; caveat, some NACVA webinars are panel‑only and don’t include scored assessments.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌‍‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠​⁠‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​‌‍​‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‍​​⁠​‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‌‌‌​⁠‍‌‍‌‍‌⁠​‍‌‍​‌‌‌​‌‌​‍‍‌‌‌⁠‌‍⁠‍‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‍‌‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I’ve had good results with NACVA’s on‑demand litigation tracks (https://www.nacva.com): they include a downloadable outline and a scored post‑test page you can save as PDF. I attach those to the completion cert plus a quick ‘how I’ll apply this’ note, and compliance hasn’t pushed back. Minor caveat: the detailed quiz breakdown sometimes disappears after you exit, so grab the results before closing.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌‍‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠​⁠‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​‌‍​‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‍​​⁠​‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌​⁠⁠​⁠​‌‌​​⁠‌​​‍‌⁠‍‌​⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌​​⁠‌‍⁠⁠‌​‍⁠​⁠​⁠‌⁠​‌‌‍‍​‌⁠‍‍‌‍‌‍​⁠‌‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌