Saw a file with twelve $9,900 cash deposits in March, each followed by an invoice for “misc consulting,” and a spreadsheet tab named “Taxes Plan B.” That pattern screams structuring plus sham invoicing; the usual encore is forfeiture with an IRC 7201/7206 duet — any other greatest hits that practically draft the indictment for you?
I’d pull the version history on that “Taxes Plan B” workbook and the invoice PDFs — OneDrive/SharePoint timestamps and PDF metadata often show the invoices were created minutes after each $9,900 deposit, which undercuts the “preexisting services” claim. Small caveat: once in a while it’s real cash sales, so I’ll cross-tie those March dates to POS Z-tapes before I cry structuring. If it’s in SharePoint, can you see who renamed that tab and when?
Check teller memos and CTR exemptions; ‘Taxes Plan B’ plus $9,900 splits should trigger SARs — any filed?
, that 45‑day egg timer invites shakedowns. Piggybacking on @dante_k88, I pre-open a reverse exchange with my QI on Day 1 so I can flip to an EAT and close anyway if the seller squeezes late — costs ~$8–15k, but it kills their leverage. Anyone gotten a lender to bless EAT title without a full retrade on terms?